CRAN Package Check Results for Package noncompliance

Last updated on 2026-10-21 11:59:12 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.2.2 17.37 49.94 67.31 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.2.2 13.55 36.20 49.75 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.2.2 11.00 32.27 43.27 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.2.2 14.00 30.95 44.95 NOTE
r-devel-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 19.00 145.00 164.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 17.26 41.82 59.08 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 16.01 42.50 58.51 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 0.2.2 4.00 13.00 17.00 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 11.00 72.00 83.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 18.00 83.00 101.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 0.2.2 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 10.00 79.00 89.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 20.00 88.00 108.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.2.2
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE File ‘noncompliance/libs/noncompliance.so’: Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’ It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol search. See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc