This vignette shows how to make network plots.
For the estimate methods, it is currently only possible detect non-zero relations and the others are set to zero (no connection in the graph). In a future release, it will be possible to define a region of equivalence to directly assess null values. Hence, it is important to note those nodes not connected are not necessarily conditionally independent (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence).
In this example, I use the bfi
data which consists of 25
variables measureing different aspects of personality.
The next step is to selec the graph or those relations for which the credible excludes zero
alternative
can be changed to, say,
"greater"
which would then perform a one-sided hypothesis
test for postive relations. This is ideal for many applications in
psychology, because often all relations are expected to
be positive.
Here is the basic plot. This works for any object from
select
(e.g., comparing groups).
The above is ggplot
that can be futher honed in. Here is
an example.
# extract communities
comm <- substring(colnames(Y), 1, 1)
plot(E,
# enlarge edges
edge_magnify = 5,
# cluster nodes
groups = comm,
# change layout
layout = "circle")$plt +
# add custom labels
scale_color_brewer(breaks = c("A",
"C",
"E",
"N",
"O"),
labels = c("Agreeableness", "Conscientiousness",
"Extraversion", "Neuroticism",
"Opennness"),
palette = "Set2")
The edge_magnify
is a value that is multiplied by the
edges, groups
allows for grouping the variables (e.g.,
those thought to belong to the same “community” will be the same color),
and the scale_color_brewer
is from the package
ggplot2
(pallete
controls the color of the
groups
). By default the edge colors are from a color blind
palette. This can be changed in plot
with the arguments
pos_col
(the color for positive edges) and
pos_neg
(the color for negative edges).
This is just scratching the surface of possibilities, as essentially any change can be made to the plot. There is lots of support for making nice plots readily available online.
It is also possible to change the layout. This is done with the
sna package, which is linked in the documentation for
plot.select
in BGGM. Here is an example
using layout = "random"
plot(E,
# enlarge edges
edge_magnify = 5,
# cluster nodes
groups = comm,
# change layout
layout = "random")$plt +
# add custom labels
scale_color_brewer(breaks = c("A",
"C",
"E",
"N",
"O"),
labels = c("Agreeableness", "Conscientiousness",
"Extraversion", "Neuroticism",
"Opennness"),
palette = "Set2")
The Bayesian hypothesis testing methods offer several advantages, for
example, that evidence for the null hypothesis of conditional
independence is formally evaluated. As a result, the
explore
method in BGGM provides plots for
both the conditional dependence and independence structure, in addition
to a plot for which the evidence was ambiguous.
To highlight this advantage, ptsd
data is used that has
a relatively small sample size.
Then plot the results. Note that there are three plots, so the package cowplot is used to combine them into one plot.
plts <- plot(E,
edge_magnify = 5,
groups = comm)
plot_grid(
plts$H1_plt +
ggtitle("Conditional Dependence") +
theme(legend.position = "none"),
plts$H0_plt +
ggtitle("Conditional Independence") +
theme(legend.position = "none"),
plts$ambiguous_plt +
ggtitle("Ambiguous"),
nrow = 1,
rel_widths = c(1, 1, 1.1)
)
As can be seen, there is not evidence for conditional independence for any of the relations. And the ambiguous network makes clear there is large uncertainty as to what or what might not be the “true” network structure. This basic idea of having three adjacency matrices was proposed in Williams and Mulder (2019).
BGGM provides a publication ready plot, but it is
also limited compared to qgraph (Epskamp et al. 2012). The one advantage of
BGGM is that all plots are ggplots
which
then allows for combining them rather easily. An example is included in
another vignette that shows how to combine several plots made with
various methods in BGGM