In this example, we are going to walk through how to use Bayesian dynamic borrowing (BDB) with the inclusion of inverse probability weighting to balance baseline covariate distributions between external and internal datasets. This particular example considers a hypothetical trial with a cross sectional normal endpoint and a known standard deviation (SD) in each treatment arm (external control arm and both internal arms), and our objective is to use BDB with IPWs to construct a posterior distribution for the control mean \(\theta_C\). We will use simulated internal and external datasets from the package where each dataset has a normally distributed response variable and four baseline covariates which we will balance.
The external control dataset has a sample size of 150 participants, and the distributions of the four covariates are as follows: - Covariate 1: normal with a mean and standard deviation of approximately 50 and 10, respectively - Covariate 2: binary (0 vs. 1) with approximately 20% of participants with level 1 - Covariate 3: binary (0 vs. 1) with approximately 60% of participants with level 1 - Covariate 4: binary (0 vs. 1) with approximately 30% of participants with level 1
The internal dataset has 120 participants with 60 participants in each of the control arm and the active treatment arms. The covariate distributions of each arm are as follows: - Covariate 1: normal with a mean and standard deviation of approximately 55 and 8, respectively - Covariate 2: binary (0 vs. 1) with approximately 30% of participants with level 1 - Covariate 3: binary (0 vs. 1) with approximately 50% of participants with level 1 - Covariate 4: binary (0 vs. 1) with approximately 30% of participants with level 1
We assume the standard deviations of both the external and internal response data are known and equal to 0.15.
library(tibble)
library(distributional)
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
set.seed(1234)
summary(int_norm_df)
#> subjid cov1 cov2 cov3
#> Min. : 1.00 Min. :33.00 Min. :0.0000 Min. :0.0000
#> 1st Qu.: 30.75 1st Qu.:49.00 1st Qu.:0.0000 1st Qu.:0.0000
#> Median : 60.50 Median :55.00 Median :0.0000 Median :1.0000
#> Mean : 60.50 Mean :54.39 Mean :0.2417 Mean :0.5333
#> 3rd Qu.: 90.25 3rd Qu.:60.00 3rd Qu.:0.0000 3rd Qu.:1.0000
#> Max. :120.00 Max. :74.00 Max. :1.0000 Max. :1.0000
#> cov4 trt y
#> Min. :0.0 Min. :0.0 Min. :-0.09789
#> 1st Qu.:0.0 1st Qu.:0.0 1st Qu.: 0.48495
#> Median :0.0 Median :0.5 Median : 0.69407
#> Mean :0.3 Mean :0.5 Mean : 0.68539
#> 3rd Qu.:1.0 3rd Qu.:1.0 3rd Qu.: 0.89461
#> Max. :1.0 Max. :1.0 Max. : 1.34632
summary(ex_norm_df)
#> subjid cov1 cov2 cov3
#> Min. : 1.00 Min. :27.00 Min. :0.0000 Min. :0.0
#> 1st Qu.: 38.25 1st Qu.:44.00 1st Qu.:0.0000 1st Qu.:0.0
#> Median : 75.50 Median :49.00 Median :0.0000 Median :1.0
#> Mean : 75.50 Mean :49.75 Mean :0.1867 Mean :0.6
#> 3rd Qu.:112.75 3rd Qu.:56.00 3rd Qu.:0.0000 3rd Qu.:1.0
#> Max. :150.00 Max. :72.00 Max. :1.0000 Max. :1.0
#> cov4 y
#> Min. :0.0000 Min. :-0.2337
#> 1st Qu.:0.0000 1st Qu.: 0.3187
#> Median :0.0000 Median : 0.5490
#> Mean :0.3467 Mean : 0.5460
#> 3rd Qu.:1.0000 3rd Qu.: 0.7580
#> Max. :1.0000 Max. : 1.3146
sd_external_control <- 0.15
sd_internal_control <- 0.15
n_external <- nrow(ex_norm_df)With the covariate data from both the external and internal datasets,
we can calculate the propensity scores and ATT inverse probability
weights (IPWs) for the internal and external controls using the
calc_prop_scr function. This creates a propensity score
object which we can use for calculating an inverse probability weighted
power prior in the next step.
Note: when reading external and internal datasets into
calc_prop_scr, be sure to include only the treatment arms
across which you want to balance the covariate distributions.
In this example, we want to balance the covariate distributions of the
external control arm to be similar to those of the internal control arm,
so we will exclude the internal active treatment arm data from this
function.
ps_model <- ~ cov1 + cov2 + cov3 + cov4
ps_obj <- calc_prop_scr(internal_df = filter(int_norm_df, trt == 0),
external_df = ex_norm_df,
id_col = subjid,
model = ps_model)
ps_obj
#>
#> ── Model ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#> • cov1 + cov2 + cov3 + cov4
#>
#> ── Propensity Scores and Weights ───────────────────────────────────────────────
#> # A tibble: 150 × 4
#> subjid Internal `Propensity Score` `Inverse Probability Weight`
#> <int> <lgl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 1 FALSE 0.175 0.212
#> 2 2 FALSE 0.219 0.281
#> 3 3 FALSE 0.497 0.990
#> 4 4 FALSE 0.257 0.347
#> 5 5 FALSE 0.257 0.347
#> 6 6 FALSE 0.425 0.740
#> 7 7 FALSE 0.328 0.489
#> 8 8 FALSE 0.0833 0.0908
#> 9 9 FALSE 0.165 0.198
#> 10 10 FALSE 0.196 0.244
#> # ℹ 140 more rows
#>
#> ── Absolute Standardized Mean Difference ───────────────────────────────────────
#> # A tibble: 4 × 3
#> covariate diff_unadj diff_adj
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 cov1 0.670 0.154
#> 2 cov2 0.229 0.0905
#> 3 cov3 0.0677 0.148
#> 4 cov4 0.252 0.0413In order to check the suitability of the external data, we can create
a variety of diagnostic plots. The first plot we might want is a
histogram of the overlapping propensity score distributions from both
datasets. To get this, we use the prop_scr_hist function.
This function takes in the propensity score object made in the previous
step, and we can optionally supply the variable we want to look at
(either the propensity score or the IPW). By default, it will plot the
propensity scores. Additionally, we can look at the densities rather
than histograms by using the prop_scr_dens function. When
looking at the IPWs with either the histogram or the density functions,
it is important to note that only the IPWs for external control
participants will be shown because the ATT IPWs of all internal control
participants are equal to 1.
The final plot we might want to look at is a love plot to visualize
the absolute standard mean differences (both unadjusted and adjusted by
the IPWs) of the covariates between the internal and external data. To
do this, we use the prop_scr_love function. Like the
previous function, the only required parameter for this function is the
propensity score object, but we can also provide a location along the
x-axis for a vertical reference line.
Now that we are happy with our propensity score object, we can use it to calculate a normal inverse probability weighted power prior for \(\theta_C\). To calculate the power prior, we need to supply:
weighted object, the propensity score we created above
response variable, in this case \(y\)
initial prior, in the form of a normal distributional object
SD of the external control response data, assumed known
The prior and the external control SD are optional. If no prior is
provided, an improper uniform prior will be used for the initial prior;
i.e., \(\pi(\theta_C) \propto 1\). If
no external control SD or initial prior are specified (i.e., both the
prior and external_sd arguments set as
NULL), then a non-standardized \(t\) power prior will be created (not
covered in this vignette). In this example, we define the initial prior
to be a vague normal distribution with a mean 50 and SD 10.
Once we have a power prior, we might want to plot it. To do that, we
use the plot_dist function.
Now that we have a normal power prior, we can calculate the posterior
distribution for \(\theta_C\) using the
calc_post_norm function. By defining our prior to be a
normal distribution and by assuming the SD of the internal response data
to be known, the resulting posterior distribution will also be normal
(the case when the SD is unknown is not covered in this vignette).
Note: if reading internal data directly into
calc_post_norm instead of a propensity score object, be
sure to include only the treatment arm of interest (e.g., the internal
control arm if creating a posterior distribution for \(\theta_C\)).
If we want to robustify our power prior for \(\theta_C\), we can add a vague component to
the power prior distribution we previously created to construct a robust
mixture prior which we can then pass to calc_post_norm. In
general, we can define our prior to be a mixture distribution with an
arbitrary number of normal and/or \(t\)
components, in which case the resulting posterior distribution will also
be a mixture of normal components. If any component of the prior is a
\(t\) distribution, the prior will be
approximated with the mixture of two normal distributions.
Lastly, we can also create a posterior distribution for the mean of
the active treatment arm by reading the internal data directly into the
calc_post_norm function and assuming the SD of the internal
active treatment arm to be equal to 0.15. In this case, we assume a
vague normal prior with mean 50 and SD 10.
As noted earlier, be sure to read in only the data for the internal active treatment arm while excluding the internal control data.
