Writing Custom Iterators

Steve Weston (originally for package iterators)

Peter Meilstrup (adapted for package iterors)

An iterator is a special type of object that supplies data on demand, one element 1 at a time. This is a nice abstraction that can help simplify many programs. Iterators are particularly useful in parallel computing, since they facilitate splitting a problem into smaller pieces that can then be executed in parallel.

Iterators can also be used to reduce the total memory that is needed at any one time. For example, if you want to process the lines of text in a file, it is common to write a loop that reads the file one line at a time, rather than reading the entire file in order to avoid running out of memory on huge files. That’s the basic idea of iterators. Iterators provide a standard method for getting the next element, which allows us to write functions that take an iterator as an argument to provide a source of data. The function doesn’t need to know what kind of iterator it is. It just needs to know how to get another piece of data. The data could be coming from a file, a database, a vector, or it could be dynamically generated.

There are a number of iterators that come in the iterors package. The iteror.array method allows you to iterate over arrays, in much the same way as the standard apply function. apply has fixed rules on how the results are returned, which may require you to reshape the results, which can be inefficient, as well as inconvenient. But since i_apply doesn’t process any data or combine the results, it is more flexible. You can use i_apply with the foreach package to perform a parallel apply operation, and combine the results any way you want via the .combine argument to foreach.

Another iterator that comes in the iterors package is the isplit function, which works much like the standard split function. split returns a list containing all of the data divided into groups. isplit only generates one group at a time, as they are needed, which can reduce the amount memory that is needed.

But of course, there will be times when you need an iterator that isn’t provided by the iterors package. That is when you need to write your own custom iterator. Fortunately, that is fairly easy to do.

What methods are needed for an iteror?

Basically, an iteror is an S3 object whose base class is "iteror", which has defined methods called nextOr and iteror.

The function iteror is a generic method. The purpose of the iteror method is to construct an iterator for the specified object. For example, this makes an iteror it out of a list:

it <- iteror(list(1:2, 3:4))

When iteror is called on a list (or any object without a class) it finds the method iteror.default, which constructs an iterator which returns one element at a time from the given vector.

If x is already of class "iteror" then iteror(x) simply returns x, which seems odd at first. But the iteror method can be defined for other objects that don’t define a nextOr method. We call those objects iterables, meaning that you can iterate over them. The iterators package defines iteror methods for vectors, lists, matrices, and data frames, making those objects iterables. By defining an iteror method for data types, you can pass those types directly to any function that expects an iterable.

If you want to create an iterator for some existing class, you can do that by writing an iteror method that constructs an appropriate iterator. The alternative is to write your own function that takes arbitrary arguments, and returns an iterator. You can choose whichever method is most natural.

The most important method required for iterators is nextOr(obj, or). Given an iteror obj, this simply returns the next value, or forces and returns its second argument or. Returning the value of or= indicates that there are no more values available in the iterator. There is (by design) no default value for or; you need to specify one.

Above we created an iterator from a list; we can now call nextOr on that iterator to get the values from the list:

nextOr(it, NULL)
## [1] 1 2
nextOr(it, NULL)
## [1] 3 4
nextOr(it, NULL)
## NULL

This shows how nextOr behaves at the stop of iteration, returning whatever value was given to argument or. Here we specified NULL, but we will later see other ways to use the second argument.

Handling the end of iteration

In many situations, you will be dealing with effectively finite data, but data for which you don’t necessarily know the length. So if you extract values one at a time from an iterator, you need to handle the case where there isn’t a next value. This is where the iterors package improves on iterators by giving you a few options for how to respond to the end of iteration.

Breaking out of a loop at end of iteration

If you are consuming an iterator in a loop, the easiest (and often fastest) way to respond to the end of iteration so to break out of the loop. You just put a break directly in the second argument of nextOr.

## [1] 1
## [1] 2
## [1] 3
## [1] 4
## [1] 5
## [1] 6
## [1] 7
## [1] 8
## [1] 9
## [1] 10

Because the or argument is lazily evaluated, the break does not execute until nextOr evaluates its second argument. You can put any code into the or argument, which will come in useful below.

Detecting end of iteration with a sentinel value

Sometimes a break or return isn’t the right action to take. As we saw above, nextOr will return its second argument (whatever that is) to signal end of iteration, when the iterator contains no more data. So you can check whether the returned value is the same as the one you provided, and interpret that as the end of iteration.

## [1] 1
## [1] 2
## [1] 3
## [1] 4
## [1] 5
## [1] 6
## [1] 7
## [1] 8
## [1] 9
## [1] 10

Here, if nextOr returns NULL, the while loop will exit. A special value used like NULL is used above, is often called a sentinel value.

Unsafe sentinel values

It’s popular to use NULL as a sentinel, but it’s worth considering what would happen if there were an iterator that legitimately returns NULL as a value. For instance, this list contains some tricky values:

Suppose you iterate over this list using NULL as your end-of-iteration sentinel, like this:

## .StopIteration
## [1] NA

The enumeration stops early because it mistakes NULL, a legitimate value in the list that we are iterating over, for NULL the sentinel value. This is a general problem with the sentinel value scheme in dynamically-typed languages; any value you could use to signal a stop, could also be a legitimate value for an iterator to emit.

Safe sentinel values

A way to escape this problem is to construct a one-shot, unique sentinel value to use locally, just with this iteror, and then throw away, not keeping it in your code. One easy way to do this by using new.env(). Consuming an iterator using a local sentinel value looks like this:

## .StopIteration
## [1] NA
## NULL
## list()
## <simpleError: StopIteration>
## [1] "Error : StopIteration\n"
## attr(,"class")
## [1] "try-error"
## attr(,"condition")
## <simpleError: StopIteration>
## [1] ""
## numeric(0)

Because environments compare by reference, a newly constructed environment is guaranteed not to be identical() to any other object in the R session, and the check for identity is very fast (just a pointer comparison.) By using a locally generated, unique sentinel value you avoid mistaking a legitimate value in your data for the end of iteration.

A simple iterator

It’s time to show the implementation of a very simple iterator. Although I’ve made it sound like you have to write your own nextOr methods, you can use a standard one. In fact, that’s what all of the following examples do. The method iteror.function takes a function you specify and wraps it in an object with class iteror, which has a nextOr method defined.

Now here’s a function that creates a very simple iterator, one that returns the same value x indefinitely.:

iforever <- function(x) {
  nextOr_ <- function(or) x
  iteror(nextOr_)
}

Note that I called the internal function nextOr_ with an underscore, rather than nextOr. I do that by convention to avoid masking the standard nextOr generic function. That would cause problems when you want your iterator to call the nextOr method of another iterator, which can be quite useful, as we’ll see in a later example.

We create an instance of this iterator by calling the iforever function, and then use it by calling the nextOr method on the resulting object:

it <- iforever(42)
nextOr(it, NULL)
## [1] 42
nextOr(it, NULL)
## [1] 42

You can also get values from an iterator using as.numeric. But since this is an infinite iterator, you need to also give an argument n argument to avoid getting stuck in an infinite loop until you run out of memory:

as.numeric(it, n=6)
## [1] 42 42 42 42 42 42

Notice that it doesn’t make sense to implement this iterator by defining a new iteror method, since there is no natural iterable to dispatch on; the argument 42 is just a vector of length 1 and iterator.default already handles that case. So instead, we implement this iterator by defining a normal function that returns the iterator.

This iterator is quite simple to implement, and possibly even useful. 2 The iterator returned by iforever is actually just the same function you provided, with the class iteror added. This means you get nextOr method already defined, whlch just delegates to your given function. Additionally since the returned object has class iteror, it inherits an iteror method that will return itself.

Of course, the reason this iterator is so simple is because it doesn’t contain any state. Most iterators need to contain some state, or it will be difficult to make it return different values and eventually stop. Managing the state is usually the real trick to writing iterators.

A stateful iterator that stops

Let’s modify the previous iterator iforever to stop after it returns a certain number of values. I’ll call the new function irep, and give it another argument called times:

irep <- function(x, times) {
  nextOr_ <- function(or) {
    if (times > 0) {
      times <<- times - 1
      x
    } else {
      or
    }
  }

  iteror(nextOr_)
}

Now let’s try it out:

it <- irep(7, 6)
unlist(as.list(it))
## [1] 7 7 7 7 7 7

The differences between iforever and irep are in the inner function nextOr_. This inner function not only accesses the values of the variables x and times, but it also modifies the value of times. This is accomplished by means of the “<<-=3 operator, and the rules of lexical scoping.

After enough calls, the inner function will find times <= 0, and will return its argument or. As the author of an iterator this is how you signal end of iteration. When implementing an iterator you never need to do anything with or other than return it when appropriate; otherwise leave it alone, allowing R to be lazy in treating that argument.

Technically, this kind of function that refers to enclosing variables is called a closure, and is a fundamental feature of R. The important thing to remember is that nextOr_ is able to get the value of variables that were passed as arguments to irep, and it can modify those values using the <<- operator. These are not global variables: they are defined in the enclosing environment of the nextOr_ function. You can create as many iterators as you want using the irep function, and they will all work as expected without conflicts.

Note that this iterator only uses the arguments to irep to store its state. If any other state variables are needed, they can be defined anywhere inside the irep function.

Using an iterator inside an iterator

The previous section described a general way of writing custom iterators. Almost any iterator can be written using those basic techniques. At times, it may be simpler to make use of an existing iterator to implement a new iterator. Let’s say that you need an iterator that splits a vector into subvectors. That can allow you to process the vector in parallel, but still use vector operations, which is essential to getting good sequential performance in R. The following function returns just such an iterator:

ivector <- function(x, ...) {
 i <- 1
 it <- idiv(length(x), ...)

 nextOr_ <- function(or) {
   n <- nextOr(it, return(or))
   ix <- seq(i, length=n)
   i <<- i + n
   x[ix]
 }

 iteror(nextOr_)
}

ivector uses ... to pass options on to idiv. idiv supports the chunks argument to split its argument into a specified number of pieces, and the chunkSize argument to split it into pieces of a specified maximum size.

Let’s create an ivector iterator to split a vector into three pieces using the chunks argument:

it <- ivector(1:25, chunks=3)
as.list(it)
## [[1]]
## [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
## 
## [[2]]
## [1] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
## 
## [[3]]
## [1] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Note how our nextOr_ function handles the end of iteration. If the underlying idiv iterator reaches the end, it will force its or argument, which we have specified as return(or), Although it is forced by the underlying iterator, R correctly evaluates a return call in a lazy argument according to the scope that call was written in. So when it of the internal idiv reaches the end, and forces its or argument, our nextOr_ passes that signal along by returning its or argument.

The nextOr method uses a lazy evaluated argument expressly for this purpose, so that you can respond to end of iteration by using a control flow operator like return, break, next or stop.

It should be clear that only minor modification need to be made to this function to create an iterator over the blocks of rows or columns of a matrix or data frame. But I’ll leave that as an exercise for the reader.

A recycling iterator

You can start to compose simple iterators together to do more complex things by writing functions that take in one iterator and construct a new one. In this example, we’ll return an iterator that recycles the values of the wrapped iterator: 4

i_recycle <- function(it) {
  values <- as.list(iteror(it))
  i <- length(values)

  nextOr_ <- function(or) {
    i <<- i + 1
    if (i > length(values)) i <<- 1
    values[[i]]
  }

  iteror(nextOr_)
}

This is fairly nice, but note that this is another one of those infinite iterators that we need to be careful about. Also, make sure that you don’t pass an infinite iterator to i_recycle. That would be pointless of course, since there’s no reason to recycle an iterator that never ends. It would be possible to write this to avoid that problem by not grabbing all of the values right up front, but you would still end up saving values that will never be recycled, so I’ve opted to keep this simple.

Let’s try it out:

it <- i_recycle(icount(3))
unlist(as.list(it, n=9))
## [1] 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

Limiting infinite iterators

I was tempted to add an argument to the i_recycle function to limit the number of values that it returns, because sometimes you want to recycle for awhile, but not forever. I didn’t do that, because rather than make i_recycle more complicated, I decided to write another function that takes an iterator and returns a modified iterator. Functions like this are composable; the limiting function can be applied to any underlying iterator instead of just i_recycle.

i_limit <- function(it, times) {
  it <- iteror(it)

  nextOr_ <- function(or) {
    if (times > 0) {
      times <<- times - 1
      nextOr(it, or)
    } else
      return(or)
  }

  iteror(nextOr_)
}

By convention, the iterors package uses the prefix i_ for this kind of composing iterator function, and a bare i for functions that build an iterator based on basic data.

Note that this looks an awful lot like the irep function that we implemented previously. In fact, using i_limit, we can implement irep using iforever much more simply, and without duplication of code:

irep2 <- function(x, times)
  i_limit(iforever(x), times)

To demonstrate irep2:

it <- irep2('foo', 3)
repeat {
  print(nextOr(it, break))
}
## [1] "foo"
## [1] "foo"
## [1] "foo"

Here’s one last example. Let’s recycle a vector three times using i_limit, and convert it back into a vector using as.numeric:

iterable <- 1:3
n <- 3
it <- i_limit(i_recycle(iterable), n * length(iterable))
as.numeric(it)
## [1] 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

Sort of a complicated version of:

rep(iterable, n)
## [1] 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

Aren’t iterators fun?

Conclusion

Writing your own iterators can be quite simple, and yet is very useful and powerful. It provides a very effective way to extend the capabilities of other packages that use iterators, such as the foreach package. By writing iterators that wrap other iterators, it is possible to put together a powerful and flexible set of tools that work well together, and that can solve many of the complex problems that come up in parallel computing.


  1. An ``element’’ in this case can be basically any object. I don’t mean to suggest that the data is necessarily returned as scalar values, for example.

  2. Be careful how you use this iterator! If you pass it to foreach, it will result in an infinite loop unless you pair it with a non-infinite iterator. Also, never pass this to the as.list function without the n argument.

  3. It’s commonly believed that <<- is only used to set variables in the global environment, but that isn’t true. I think of it as an inheriting assignment operator.}

  4. Actually, many of the standard iteror methods support a recycle argument. But this is a nice example, and a more general solution, since it works on any iterator.